Factores de satisfacción en e-learning en estudiantes universitarios
Satisfaction factors in e-learning in university studentsContenido principal del artículo
El avance acelerado de la instrucción en línea en las universidades, impulsado por la pandemia de COVID-19, ha transformado la forma en que se lleva a cabo el proceso educativo. El objetivo de este estudio fue evaluar la satisfacción de estudiantes universitarios con e-learning en una institución peruana. El tipo de estudio fue básico con diseño descriptivo. La muestra censal comprende a 120 estudiantes. Para la recolección de datos se utilizó un cuestionario de 23 ítems, se analizaron cinco dimensiones: infraestructura tecnológica, servicio ofrecido, información, interacción con profesores e interacción con compañeros. Los resultados indican que observa que los factores de satisfacción se encuentran en 0% en malo, 76 % en regular y de 24% en bueno. No obstante, la entrega de información y la calidad del servicio recibieron calificaciones menos favorables. Los resultados resaltan la importancia de mejorar la entrega de contenidos y los servicios de apoyo en el e-learning.
The accelerated advancement of online instruction in universities, driven by the COVID-19 pandemic, has transformed the way in which the educational process is carried out. The objective of this study was to evaluate the satisfaction of university students with e-learning in a Peruvian institution. The type of study was basic with a descriptive design. The census sample comprised 120 students. A 23-item questionnaire was used for data collection, and five dimensions were analyzed: technological infrastructure, service offered, information, interaction with professors and interaction with classmates. The results indicate that the satisfaction factors are 0% in bad, 76% in fair and 24% in good. However, the delivery of information and quality of service received less favorable ratings. The results highlight the importance of improving content delivery and support services in e-learning.
Descargas
Detalles del artículo
Abu-Taieh, E., Al-Wesabi, H., Ayouby, M., y Al-Hader, M. (2022). Utilizing a Technology Acceptance Model for E-Learning Success Prediction: The Case of Jordan. Sustainability, 14(5), 1847. doi:10.3390/su14051847
Al-Adwan, A. S., Albelbisi, N. A., Hujran, O., Al-Rahmi, W. M., y Alkhalifah, A. (2021). Developing a holistic success model for sustainable e-learning: a structural equation modeling approach. Sustainability, 13. doi:10.3390/su13169453
Alamri, M. A., Almaiah, W. M., y Al-Rahmi, A. (2020). Social media applications affecting students’ academic performance: a model developed for sustainability in higher education. Sustainability, 12. doi:10.3390/su12166471
Allen, I. E., Omori, M., Burrell, N., Mabry, E., y Timmerman, B. E. (2013). Examining satisfaction in fully online programs. Internet and Higher Education, 17, 122-135.
Aparicio, M., Bacao, F., y Oliveira, T. (2017). An e-Learning theoretical framework. Educational Technology & Society, 20(1), 292-307. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.10.009
Arbaugh, J. B. (2000). Virtual classroom characteristics and student satisfaction with internet-based MBA courses. Journal of Management Education, 24(1), 32-54. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/89839/.
Bigatel, Paula M. y Edel-Malizia, Stephanie (2017). “Using the indicators of engaged learning online framework to evaluate online course quality”, TechTrends, vol. 62, núm. 1, pp. 58-70. doi: 10.1007/s11528-017-0239-4
Cidral, W. A., Oliveira, T. de, Di Felice, M., y Aparicio, M. (2018). E-learning success determinants: Brazilian empirical study. Computers & Education, 122, 273-290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.12.001
Drouin, M. A. (2008). The relationship between students' satisfaction with online learning and cognitive load. Journal of Educational Technology Development and Exchange, 1(1), 5-16.
Ebner, M., Schiefner, M., y Kumar, S. (2020). Factors influencing students' satisfaction with e-learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(1), 32.
Fawaz, M. y Samaha, A. (2021). “E-learning: depression, anxiety, and stress symptomatology among Lebanese university students during COVID-19 quarantine”, Nursing Forum, Vol. 56 No. 1, pp. 52-57. DOI: 10.1111/nuf.12521
González, E. (2021). Educación virtual y satisfacción estudiantil durante la pandemia de Covid-19 en una universidad de Ecuador 2021. [Tesis de maestría, Universidad César Vallejo] Repositorio UCV. https://repositorio.ucv.edu.pe/handle/20.500.12692/69339
Hodges, C., Moore, S., Lockee, B., Trust, T., y Bond, A. (2020). The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning. EDUCAUSE Review, 27. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2020/3/the-difference-between-emergency-remote-teaching-and-online-learning
Huamán, E. J., Ramírez, A., y González, C. (2023). Perceived student satisfaction as an indicator of e-learning service quality. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 26(1), 118-131.
Jiang, X., Zhang, H., Wang, T., y Zhang, C. (2023). The association of self-control, self-efficacy, and demographic characteristics with home-based E-learning behavior in nursing and midwifery undergraduates: a cross-sectional study under the COVID-19 epidemic. Nurse Education Today, 120, 105628. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2022.105628
Lujan-Mora, S. (2017). On the design and evaluation of e-learning courses: A proposed methodology based on Business Process Model and Notation (BPMN). Computers & Education, 113, 218-235.
Mohammadi, H. (2015). Investigating users' perspectives on e-learning: An integration of TAM and IS success model. Computers in Human Behavior, 45, 359-374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.07.044
Moore, J. C., y Shelton, K. (2014). A conceptual framework for comparing student satisfaction among face-to-face and online learning environments. The Internet and Higher Education, 20, 36-44.
Nikou, S. A., y Maslov, A. V. (2021). Assessing intention to use e-learning during the COVID-19 pandemic in non-academic contexts: Extending the technology acceptance model. Computers in Human Behavior, 118. https://www.emerald.com/insight/2056-4880.htm
Nortvig, A. M., Petersen, A. K., y Balle, S. H. (2018). Attracting university students to on-campus and online education. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 19(1).
Peralta Castro, M., Escobar Jurado, N., Mora Rodríguez, J. C., Martínez González, R., y Rocío Velandia, M. (2014). Influencia de la satisfacción estudiantil en la persistencia y el rendimiento académico. Perfiles Educativos, 36(146), 125-142.
Rubio Gómez, M. (2003). Evaluación de la calidad en la formación en red. RUSC. Universities and Knowledge Society Journal, 1(1), 1-17.
Sáiz Manzanares, M. C., Casanova, J. R., Lencastre, J. A., y Almeida, L. S. (2022). Satisfacción de los estudiantes con la docencia online en tiempos de COVID-19. Comunicar: Revista científica iberoamericana de comunicación y educación. https://doi.org/10.3916/C70- 2022-03
Segovia, L. (2021). Factors of student satisfaction in different virtual universities in Colombia. Revista de Investigación Educativa, 38(2), 567-582.
Segovia-García, N., y Said-Hung, E. (2021). Factores de satisfacción de los alumnos en e-learning en Colombia [Factors of Student Satisfaction with E-learning in Colombia]. Revista Mexicana de Investigación Educativa, 26(89), 595-621. https://doi.org/10.22201/iisue.24486167e.2021.89.70035
Simpson, O. (2003). Student retention in online, open, and distance learning. RoutledgeFalmer.
Soffer, T., y Nachmias, R. (2018). A model of factors affecting students' satisfaction and learning outcomes in an asynchronous online learning environment. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 34(3), 193-206.
Zambrano, A. (2012). Los avances tecnológicos en la era digital y su impacto en la educación: El caso del e-learning. Revista de Educación a Distancia, 12(42), 1-15.
Zambrano, R. (2016). Interacciones en el aula virtual en el programa de Administración de Empresas de una universidad de Bogotá. Revista Electrónica Educare, 20(1), 1–20.