La argumentación científica en estudiantes de educación secundaria: Revisión Sistemática
Scientific argumentation in secondary school students: Systematic reviewContenido principal del artículo
La argumentación científica implica la elaboración y justificación de proposiciones basadas en evidencias con fundamento científico. El objetivo fue describir las estrategias educativas efectivas para el desarrollo de la argumentación científica y sus componentes, en estudiantes de secundaria a través de análisis de revisión sistemática. Con criterios de inclusión: artículos con diferente tipo estudio; desde junio del 2020 hasta marzo del 2022; en las bases de datos Scopus, Ebsco y ProQuest; con ecuaciones de búsqueda: (“Scientific argumentation AND high school students”), (“Scientific reasoning AND high school students”), (“Argumentación científica AND estudiantes de secundaria”), (“Razonamiento científico AND estudiantes de secundaria”).Criterios de exclusión: artículos duplicados; seleccionando 30 artículos para el análisis. En conclusión, el desarrollo de la argumentación científica en los estudiantes de secundaria se logra al ombinar los cuatro componentes retórica, pragmática, teórica y lógica, utilizando estrategias efectivas que permitan favorecer la argumentación científica en los estudiantes.
Scientific argumentation involves the elaboration and justification of propositions based on evidence with scientific foundation. The objective was to describe effective educational strategies for the development of scientific argumentation and its components, in high school students through systematic review analysis. With inclusion criteria: articles with different type of study; from June 2020 to March 2022; in Scopus, Ebsco and ProQuest databases; with search equations: (“Scientific argumentation AND high school students”), (“Scientific reasoning AND high school students”), (“Scientific argumentation AND high school students”), (“Scientific reasoning AND high school students”). Exclusion criteria: duplicate articles; selecting 30 articles for the analysis. In conclusion, the development of scientific argumentation in high school students is achieved by combining the four components rhetoric, pragmatics, theory and logic, using effective strategies that allow favoring scientific argumentation in students.
Descargas
Detalles del artículo
Abdullah, R., Pikoli, M., y Suleman, N. (2021). Analysis of scientific argument of vocational high school students on the topic of substance change. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1760(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1760/1/012008
Admoko, S., Hanifah, N., Suprapto, N., Hariyono, E., y Madlazim, M. (2021). The implementation of Argument Driven Inquiry (ADI) learning model to improve scientific argumentation skills of high school students. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1747(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1747/1/012046
Akbayrak, K., y Namdar, B. (2019). An argumentation activity for third-grade students: objects in the plates. Science Activities, 56(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/00368121.2019.1600464
Alindra, A. L., Widodo, A., y Rahman, T. (2020). The consistency of the students’ arguments in the socioscientific issue about cloning on extinct animals, animal for sacrifice (Qurban) purposes and human. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1521(4), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1521/4/042023
Allchin, D., y Zemplén, G. A. (2020). Finding the place of argumentation in science education: Epistemics and Whole Science. Science Education, 104(5), 907–933. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21589
Anisa, A., Widodo, A., Riandi, R., y Muslim, M. (2019). Genetics in socio scientific issues: measuring rebuttal abilities in scientific argumentation. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1280(3), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1280/3/032002
Astira, S., Sajidan, y Dwiastuti, S. (2019). Analysis of Argumentation Skills in Biological Learning in Senior High School Students. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1338(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1338/1/012032
Astuti, R. N., Suyono, S., y Nur, M. (2018). The Argumentation Skills of Junior High School Students on Physical Changes and Chemical Changes. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1108(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1108/1/012127
Casas-Quiroga, L., y Crujeiras-Pérez, B. (2020). Epistemic operations performed by high school students in an argumentation and decision-making context: Setrocia’s alimentary emergency. International Journal of Science Education, 42(16), 2653–2673. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2020.1824300
Chen, H. T., Wang, H. H., Lu, Y. Y., y Hong, Z. R. (2019). Bridging the Gender Gap of Children’s Engagement in Learning Science and Argumentation Through a Modified Argument-Driven Inquiry. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 17(4), 635–655. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-018-9896-9
Conceição Pinto, S. M., Ferreira, S., Torres, A. K. L., y Pereira, A. L. (2018). Argumentação de estudantes da educação básica sobre dilemas sócio-científicos no projeto ENGAGE. Revista Ibero-Americana de Estudos Em Educação, 13(1), 207–228. https://doi.org/10.21723/riaee.v13.n1.2018.10242
Corbaci, N., y Yakisan, M. (2018). Fen Bilimleri Dersi Duyu Organlar? Konusu ?le ?lgili 7. S?n?f Ö?rencilerinin Geli?tirdikleri Argümanlar?n Analizi. OMU Journal of Education Faculty, 37(1), 249–263. https://doi.org/10.7822/omuefd.408922
Dawson, V., y Carson, K. (2020). Introducing Argumentation About Climate Change Socioscientific Issues in a Disadvantaged School. Research in Science Education, 50(3), 863–883. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-018-9715-x
Evagorou, M., Nicolaou, C., y Lymbouridou, C. (2020). Modelling and Argumentation with Elementary School Students. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 20(1), 58–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42330-020-00076-9
Giri, V., y Paily, M. U. (2020). Effect of Scientific Argumentation on the Development of Critical Thinking. Science and Education, 29(3), 673–690. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-020-00120-y
Guler, C., y Dogru, M. (2019). The Effect of “Argument-Based Sciencie Inquiry” Approach on Sciencie Teacher Candidates’ Academic Achievements. International Online Journal of Education and Teaching (IOJET), 4(3), 229–244. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/276292902.pdf
Gurkan, G., y Kahraman, S. (2019). Evaluation of pre-service science teachers’ argumentation skills, knowledge levels and attitudes regarding organ transplantation and donation. European Journal of Educational Research, 8(2), 545–558. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.8.2.545
Gutiérrez, M. F. (2018). Socioscientific argumentation and model- based reasoning: A study on mining exploitation in Colombia. Universitas Psychologica, 17(5), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.upsy17-5.samb
Hakim, A., Sahmadesti, I., y Hadisaputra, S. (2020). Promoting students’ argumentation skill through development science teaching materials based on guided inquiry models. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1521(4). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1521/4/042117
Hamalosmanoglu, M., y Varinlioglu, S. (2019). The Effects of Argumentation Activities on Seventh Grade Students’ Environmental Attitudes and Their Knowledge Level. Science Education International, 30(3), 158–168. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33828/sei.v30.i3.2
Hefter, M. H., Renkl, A., Riess, W., Schmid, S., Fries, S., y Berthold, K. (2018). Training Interventions to Foster Skill and Will of Argumentative Thinking. Journal of Experimental Education, 86(3), 325–343. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2017.1363689
Ibacache Plaza, M., y Merino Rubilar, C. (2021). Una propuesta de secuencia basada en el contexto, para la promoción de la argumentación científica en el aprendizaje de las reacciones químicas con estudiantes de educación media técnico profesional. Revista Eureka Sobre Enseñanza y Divulgación de Las Ciencias, 18(1), 110501–110517. https://doi.org/http://doi.org/10.25267/Rev_Eureka_ensen_divulg_cienc.2021.v18.i1.1105
Kahraman, B., y Kaya, O. N. (2021). A thematic content analysis of rhetorical and dialectical argumentation studies in science education. Ilkogretim Online- Elementary Education Online, 20(1), 53–79. https://doi.org/10.17051/ilkonline.2021.01.014
Lee, H. S., Pallant, A., Pryputniewicz, S., Lord, T., Mulholland, M., y Liu, O. L. (2019). Automated text scoring and real-time adjustable feedback: Supporting revision of scientific arguments involving uncertainty. Science Education, 103(3), 590–622. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21504
Mehl, C. E., Jin, H., y Llort, K. F. (2020). Student Decision Making in a Scenario-based Investigation of an Ecosystem. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/112278
Meral, E., Sahin, I. F., y Akba?, Y. (2021). The Effects of Argumentation-Based Teaching Approach on Students’ Critical Thinking Disposition and Argumentation Skills: “Population in Our Country Unit.” International Journal of Psychology and Educational Studies, 8(1), 51–74. https://doi.org/10.17220/ijpes.2021.8.1.195
Murphy, P. K., Greene, J. A., Allen, E., Baszczewski, S., Swearingen, A., Wei, L., y Butler, A. M. (2018). Fostering high school students’ conceptual understanding and argumentation performance in science through Quality Talk discussions. Science Education, 102(6), 1239–1264. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21471
Nababan, N. P., Nasution, D., y Jayanti, R. D. (2019). The Effect of Scientific Inquiry Learning Model and Scientific Argumentation on the Students’ Science Process Skill. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1155(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1155/1/012064
Naj’Iyah, A. L., Viyanti, y Suyatna, A. (2021). Learning Strategies Design to Accommodate Learning Styles, Initial Knowledge and Reduce the Differences of Scientific Reasoning and Argumentation Performance. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1788(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1788/1/012031
Najami, N., Hugerat, M., Kabya, F., y Hofstein, A. (2020). The Laboratory as a Vehicle for Enhancing Argumentation Among Pre-Service Science Teachers. Science and Education, 29(2), 377–393. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-020-00107-9
Namdar, B., y Tuskan, ?. B. (2018). Fen bilgisi ö?retmenlerinin argümantasyona yönelik görü?leri. Hacettepe Egitim Dergisi, 33(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.16986/HUJE.2017030137
Noviyanti, N. I., Mukti, W. R., Yuliskurniawati, I. D., Mahanal, S., y Zubaidah, S. (2019). Students’ scientific argumentation skills based on differences in academic ability. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1241(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1241/1/012034
Nurinda, S., Sajidan, S., y Prayitno, B. A. (2018). Effectiveness of Problem-Based Learning Module as An Instructional Tool in Improving Scientific Argumentation Skill. Biosaintifika: Journal of Biology & Biology Education, 10(2), 334–340. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.15294/biosaintifika.v10i2.12600 1
Okomus, S. (2020). Argümantasyon Destekli ??birlikli Ö?renme Modelinin Akademik Ba?ar?ya, Ele?tirel Dü?ünme E?ilimine ve Sosyobilimsel Konulara Yönelik Tutuma Etkisi. Ondokuz May?s Üniversitesi E?itim Fakültesi Dergisi, 39(2), 269–293. https://doi.org/10.7822/omuefd.570419
Pimvichai, J., Yuenyong, C., y Buaraphan, K. (2019). Development of grade 10 students’ scientific argumentation through the science-technology-society learning unit on work and energy. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 9(3), 428–441. https://doi.org/10.3926/JOTSE.527
Ping, I. L. L., Halim, L., y Osman, K. (2020). Explicit teaching of scientific argumentation as an approach in developing argumentation skills, science process skills and biology understanding. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 19(2), 276–288. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/20.19.276
Plantin, C. (2014). Language, argumentation and learning in the school. 95–114. https://revistas.pedagogica.edu.co/index.php/TED/article/view/2914/2635
Rahayu, D. P., y Widodo, A. (2019). The profile of scientific argumentation skill student’s using “Toulmin argumentation pattern” analysis in the solving energy problem on the students of class VII. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, 1481, 161–165. https://doi.org/10.1145/3318396.3318421
Revel Chion, A., Diaz Guevara, C., y Aduriz-Bravo, A. (2021). Argumentación científica escolar y su contribución al aprendizaje del tema «salud y enfermedad». Revista Eureka, 18(3), 617–627. https://doi.org/10.25267/Rev_Eureka_ensen_divulg_cienc.2021.v18.i3.3101
Songsil, W., Pongsophon, P., Boonsoong, B., y Clarke, A. (2019). Developing scientific argumentation strategies using revised argument-driven inquiry (rADI) in science classrooms in Thailand. Asia-Pacific Science Education, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41029-019-0035-x
Suliyanah, Fadillah, R. N., y Deta, U. A. (2020). The Process of Developing Students’ Scientific Argumentation Skill Using Argument-Driven Inquiry (ADI) Model in Senior High School on the Topic of Elasticity. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1491(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1491/1/012046
Suminar, L., Muslim, y Liliawati, W. (2017). Integrated argument-based inquiry with multiple representation approach to promote scientific argumentation skill. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1848(1), 05000201–05000205. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4983958
Syerliana, L., Muslim, y Setiawan, W. (2018). Argumentation skill profile using “toulmin Argumentation Pattern” analysis of high school student at Subang on topic hydrostatic pressure. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1013(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1013/1/012031
Ural, E., y Genço?lan, D. M. (2020). The effect of argumentation-based science teaching approach on 8th graders’ learning in the subject of acids-bases, their attitudes towards science class and scientific process skills. Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 16(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.29333/ijese/6369
Yulianci, S., Asriyadin, Nurjumiati, Kaniawati, I., Liliawati, W., y Muliana. (2021). Preliminary analysis of module development by setting arguments through the application of scientific inquiry models to improve students’ scientific attitudes. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1806(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1806/1/012021